Warning: main(/home/hubpol/public_html/devalwatch/above.php) [function.main]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/devalpat/public_html/archives/2009/05/interesting.php on line 98

Warning: main() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/hubpol/public_html/devalwatch/above.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/devalpat/public_html/archives/2009/05/interesting.php on line 98

May 07, 2009
Interesting

What is Gov. Patrick up to now?

Governor Deval Patrick, who once headed the Civil Rights Division of the US Justice Department, plans to appeal a federal court ruling that allows minority police officers to pursue a civil rights lawsuit challenging the state's promotional exam.

The Patrick administration filed notice Monday that it will appeal an April 7 ruling by US District Court Judge Joseph L. Tauro to the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Tauro rejected the Patrick administration's motion to dismiss the suit by 44 black and Hispanic patrol officers from seven departments who contend that the written civil service exam for sergeant is discriminatory.

"We are shocked that Deval Patrick is continuing to defend these exams and opposing our efforts to reform this discriminatory promotional system," said Shannon Liss-Riordan of Boston, the lawyer for the officers. "With Deval Patrick as the governor, you'd think he'd be trying to fix this problem, rather than throw away the state's money litigating it."

Kyle Sullivan, a spokesman for Patrick, said in a statement that the governor "believes that all citizens in the Commonwealth should be afforded the same opportunities for employment." Nonetheless, the administration, represented by Attorney General Martha Coakley, is seeking dismissal of the claims because the officers are employees of cities and towns, not the state, Sullivan said. Tauro rejected that position.

The lawsuit, which the officers unsuccessfully asked the judge to certify as a class action claim, is scheduled to go to trial next month.

At issue is a multiple-choice promotional exam prepared by the state Human Resources Division and used by about 200 police departments across the state, said Liss-Riordan. The 44 plaintiffs are patrol officers who took the exam since 2005 but have not received promotions. They work in police departments in Boston, Lawrence, Lowell, Methuen, Springfield, Worcester, and the MBTA Transit Police.

The officers say that the exam, which relies heavily on rote memorization of facts about law enforcement, discriminates against members of minority groups and has prevented advancement within the ranks. As a result, they said, supervisors in departments do not reflect the diversity of their communities.

In Lawrence, where minority groups make up three-quarters of the population, only two of the 39 police supervisors were members of minority groups, the officers said when filing the suit in September 2007. Methuen, which is more than 10 percent minority, had no minority members among its 25 supervisors, the suit said.

UPDATE: More from the Herald and Globe.

SECOND UPDATE: From Michael Graham.

THIRD UPDATE: More from Holly Robichaud, Mass. News Platoon, the Seattle Examiner, Somerville News, New Hampshire Business Review, the Herald and the Globe.

FOURTH UPDATE: From the Globe and Herald.

Posted by D. R. Tucker at 06:01 AM | Comments (1)  | Track



Comments

I'm just wondering how an exam "prepared by the state Human Resources Division" and "which relies heavily on rote memorization of facts about law enforcement" could possibly be "discriminitory".

So, what they are contending is that the fact that they have to memorize facts about law enforcement, and have ro remember these facts for an exam discriminates against them because of.....??? What exactly?

Do non "minority" officers have some edge here that I am not aware of? Is memorization easier for the white guy than it is for the hispanic guy?

How these suits don't get thrown out the second they are filed is beyond me.

Posted by: V at May 8, 2009 10:14 AM